Thursday, December 29, 2011

ADR Mediation Conference: How to Catch a Liar

As a mediator and as a Guardian Ad Litem (GAL), one of the most challenging problems to handle is this: one of them is lying, and you're not sure which one. Some examples? Spouses offer absolute opposite accounts about whether one refused to allow the other to pick up the child for parenting time or not; the amount of back child support that is due; or whether a parent tried to call or not. These are fact-based questions, and frequently the only evidence is created by the parties, unverified by independent sources.

When mediating, in some sense, it doesn't matter which one is lying. If the parties can agree to some version of facts for resolving the issues (e.g., "let's just agree that the amount X is going to pay in back child support is $Y"), then there is room for a deal to be made. (Notice this does not decide how much X owes, just how much X is going to pay.) Ditto if the mediator can redirect the parents toward the future, not the past.

Outside of mediation, however, when asked by a judge to fact-find as a Guardian for the minor child, it does matter who's lying. And as a mediator, it definitely can help speed the negotiation along if I know who's lying.

That is why I was so intrigued by the presentation "Dodging Lies and Making Deals: the Science of Lie Detection and Emotional Truthfulness" offered by Clark Freshman at the 18th Annual Alternative Dispute Resolution Conference for Neutrals held earlier this month.

Freshman is a law professor at the University of California Hastings in San Francisco, and his research is based on the analysis of body language and facial expressions -- especially microexpressions -- pioneered by Paul Ekman. If you ever saw the TV show Lie to Me, you know what I'm talking about.

The substance of the training is too nuanced to offer here, but what was most intriguing about the presentation was discovering how extraordinarily bad at detecting lies most of us were -- even when we caught the microexpressions, we were not sure what they meant, when paired with the person's words or other body language.

Interested in getting better? Check out the training videos on Dr. Ekman's website: http://www.paulekman.com/

Friday, October 28, 2011

My Strongest Weapon Is In My Pocket Right Now


Last night I attended the Stonewall Bar Association's annual dinner at Georgia Tech Conference Center along with 277 other LGBT and gay-friendly attorneys, judges, law students, legal professionals, and service providers. The event honored Dan Grossman, a constitutional law attorney from Atlanta who won a settlement from the city of Atlanta after the Atlanta Police Department conducted an unlawful raid on the Eagle, a popular leather bar in Atlanta, grossly violated the 4th amendment rights of the people in the bar.

During his keynote address, Grossman reminded us that most of us walk around armed at all times -- with our bar cards -- and it is our duty to do good with them. Everyone hopes to get rich, but that's not why most people become lawyers. We become attorneys because we want to serve justice, and to stick up for the underdogs.

In my small practice, I always have at least one pro bono case open at a time (usually two), and I provide dozens of hours of pro bono work each year as a guardian ad litem through the Atlanta Volunteer Lawyers Foundation.

As we reach the end of Celebrate Pro Bono week, I am inspired by Grossman, 2011 award recipient Christine Koehler and by all of the other attorneys out there who routinely work for free to ensure that justice is served.

Thursday, October 6, 2011

Meet Me at Atlanta Pride this Weekend

I will be at the Atlanta Pride festival this Saturday, Oct. 8th volunteering in the Stonewall Bar Association booth located at Blue-7 (between PAWS Atlanta and the Atlanta Opera) between 10-noon and 2-4 p.m. This year's Pride festival will be held in Piedmont Park. Come say hello and pick up freebies: we are handing out really cute Stonewall Bar coasters & our handy directories of gay and gay-friendly attorneys and judges throughout Georgia. The festival is free, with live entertainment, and you can even bring your own cooler.

Friday, September 16, 2011

Should there be a national sperm bank registry?

The New York Times has been running an interesting series of op-ed articles about whether the U.S. should regulate sperm banks. While most of the columnists have opposed regulation, one of my former law professors, Naomi Cahn, raises a question worth considering: is it a problem if one person is the biological father for 150 children in this country? Here's the article.

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

If Using a Known Donor to Inseminate, Don't Pick a Father

If you are going to use a sperm donor to get pregnant, picking someone who is already a dad seems like a good idea, right? After all, that person has a track record! Not so fast -- according to this L.A. Times article, being a father depletes testosterone levels. Lower testosterone usually equals lower sperm count.

*Note to prospective parents -- this does not mean that you need to cross everyone off of your list who has previously gotten someone pregnant: the study suggests that it is the act of parenting which lowers testosterone levels, not the mere act of reproducing.

Post-Break Up: How to Handle Your Tattoo With Your Ex's Name


Brilliant idea from a radio DJ this morning, for what to do about the tattoo with your ex's name on it if you can't afford to remove it or don't want to go through the pain of removing it: get a cat or a dog and name it after your ex.

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

The Court Order You Will Never Get

In my divorce practice, I sometimes find that my clients have unrealistic expectations about what the law can and cannot do for them. Generally, the law does not favor self-help. This means that even if you get a court order, the court and the police must be the ones to enforce it.

Divorce and custody cases are filed in Georgia in superior court, which is a court of equity. Custody cases are decided based on a "best interest of the child" standard, and in assessing this standard, the courts are permitted to consider factors such as the character of the parents, which is otherwise impermissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence and Georgia law.

That said, however, there's a difference between what is evidence of bad character vs. what is a difference of opinion on parenting style. A person can be a terrible spouse, but an excellent parent.

If you are wanting "justice" (with you doing the defining of what is just), you are not likely to get it from a court. But, just for fun, I've created a fill-in-the-blank form for you to fill out as a venting exercise. Please don't take this to Court -- it would be embarrassing.

Final note if you are looking for help in how to draft a contract: note that for each of the major things the Ex is required to do, there's a consequence if it is not done. These particular consequences are insane, of course (and the examples of bad behavior not all frivolous, and taken from my actual cases over the years), but generally, you want to build in consequences for each action in your contracts.

Link to download: The Order You Will Never Get

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Non-Sceney Social Opportunity Post-Break-up: Square Dancing

How do you meet people following a break-up, without the pressure to immediately start dating again? Square dancing! New classes started on August 8 for the Hotlanta Squares, an LGBT square-dancing group that dances each Monday night from 7-9 p.m. at the First Metropolitan Community Church located at I-85/N. Druid Hills Rd in Atlanta. All are welcome (including allies). No special skill required.

Square dancing is a good old-fashioned drug/alcohol-free fun way to meet people, get a little exercise and have a very good time. Dress is utterly casual (most people wear shorts & t-shirts in the summer), and the Squares change up dance positions all night long, so you do not need to bring a partner. (In fact, most people do not come with a partner, so it is a perfect activity for single (or newly-single) people!)

Classes are FREE for the first three weeks of the open house (August 8, 15 & 22) and only $5 each week thereafter.

Friday, July 29, 2011

TIME Magazine: Men & Women Do About the Same Amount of Housework

This week's issue of TIME has an interesting article about new research revealing that men and women do about equal amounts of housework.

I was initially skeptical, but the researcher's larger point -- that more of today's fathers expect to -- and do -- take an active, equal role in parenting their children echoes what I have seen in my divorce practice. Many of my male clients have begun custody discussions by stating, "I want to have my children with me 50% of the time and I will not accept anything less." It is always admirable and encouraging to see parents committed to equal parenting of their children, even when they cannot live together anymore.

Friday, July 22, 2011

Playlist: Empowering Break-up Songs

Wallowing in power ballads is never a good idea, post-break-up. Ok, a little wallowing is ok -- but when you are ready to start moving on, you need a kick-butt set of empowering songs on your playlist. What would be on such a playlist though? Here are some of my initial thoughts:

• I WILL SURVIVE by Gloria Gaynor (or Cake)
• F* YOU by Cee-Lo Green
• STRONGER by Sara Evans
• SO WHAT by Pink
• YOU'LL THINK OF ME by Keith Urban
• FIGHTER by Christina Aguilera
• IRREPLACEABLE by BeyoncĂ©
• SINCE U BEEN GONE by Kelly Clarkson
• PICTURE TO BURN by Taylor Swift
• CRY ME A RIVER by Justin Timberlake
• BELIEVE by Cher
• SURVIVOR by Destiny's Child

What else would you add? Feel free to comment.

Monday, April 25, 2011

The worst interest of the child

From Saturday's New York Times, a case that illustrates the exact opposite of what is meant by the "best interest of the child" standard used in child custody cases in Georgia: a lesbian couple splits, and the biological mother treats the couple's child like a piece of property, dragging the child from Vermont to Virginia to Nicaragua, while bad-mouthing her ex, in violation of a whole slew of state, federal, and international laws.

OCGA 19-9-3(a)(3) sets out 17 factors that courts consider when determining what the best interest of the child is. One of those factors is "(N) The willingness and ability of each of the parents to facilitate and encourage a close and continuing parent-child relationship between the child and the other parent, consistent with the best interest of the child."

You don't need to go to law school to think about how this looks from this poor kid's perspective, and to know that this high-conflict litigation, secrecy, media attention, and surreptitious moves are NOT in the best interest of the child.

How to Get a Gay Divorce in Georgia